Google Agentspace and Agent.Space are not the same product, and Agent.Space is not owned by or affiliated with Google. Google Agentspace was introduced as an enterprise search and agent platform. Its technology is now part of Google Cloud's Gemini Enterprise. Agent.Space is an independent cloud Workspace for coding-agent harnesses such as Codex, Claude Code, Grok Build, OpenCode, and DeepSeek Harness.
The similar names can put both products in the same search results, but they solve different jobs. Choose Gemini Enterprise when employees need governed access to company knowledge, connected business applications, and no-code agents. Consider Agent.Space when developers need supported coding agents to work against persistent project files in a cloud Workspace.
Last verified: September 14, 2026. Google product names, editions, prices, connectors, and Agent.Space availability can change. Check the linked official pages and live product screens before purchasing.
Google Agentspace vs Agent.Space at a glance
This is a comparison of product responsibilities, not a claim that the products have equal scope. Gemini Enterprise is a broad workplace platform. Agent.Space is deliberately narrower: it focuses on the environment around coding agents.
What happened to Google Agentspace?
Google introduced Google Agentspace in December 2024 as a way for employees to search enterprise information, use AI assistance, and take actions across connected systems. The original Google Cloud announcement described company search, NotebookLM for enterprise, prebuilt connectors, custom agents, and administrative controls.
That old announcement now includes an editor's note: Agentspace is part of Gemini Enterprise, and the agent creation and orchestration technology behind it powers core Gemini Enterprise functions. Google introduced Gemini Enterprise in October 2025 as its front door for AI in the workplace.
So if you search “what happened to Google Agentspace,” the practical answer is not that its central ideas disappeared. The current product to evaluate is Gemini Enterprise. Its scope includes an employee-facing chat interface, Gemini models, a no-code workbench, Google and custom agents, connections to organizational data, and centralized governance.
The distinction matters for procurement and documentation. An older tutorial may still say “Agentspace,” while current setup, editions, availability, and support live under Gemini Enterprise. Use Google's current product and documentation pages rather than treating old Agentspace screenshots or prices as current.
Is Agent.Space related to Google?
No. Agent.Space is not owned by Google, is not a Google Cloud product, and does not claim a partnership with Google. The period in Agent.Space is part of the independent product's displayed name; it does not indicate a Google edition or a new URL for Google Agentspace.
Agent.Space also has no access to a company's Google Cloud data merely because a user arrives after searching “Google agent space.” Connecting a product to Google Workspace, enterprise applications, or regulated data requires an explicit supported integration, authentication, permissions, and governance path. Similar names provide none of those things.
If you are looking for Google’s enterprise product, use the current Gemini Enterprise product page. If you are looking for a cloud environment where coding agents operate on a real project, review how the Agent.Space Workspace works.
Choose Gemini Enterprise for enterprise knowledge and governed agents
Gemini Enterprise is the more relevant choice when the job begins with organizational data and broad employee access.
Typical requirements include:
- letting employees search across documents, messages, and business applications;
- connecting systems such as Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, SAP, or Jira;
- giving non-developers a no-code way to create or orchestrate agents;
- centrally managing agent access, security, audits, and compliance controls;
- supporting business workflows across sales, finance, marketing, HR, operations, and IT.
These are not side features. They are central to the product. Replacing them requires more than a chat interface or a coding sandbox: it requires connectors, identity, permissions, indexing, administration, and operational governance.
Google's current page lists a Business edition starting at $21 per seat per month and Standard/Plus starting at $30 per seat per month. It also describes a gradually rolling out pay-as-you-go option for eligible organizations. Those figures and conditions were checked on September 14, 2026; use the current Gemini Enterprise page for the latest edition, quota, seat, regional, and sales terms.
Consider Agent.Space for a persistent coding-agent project
Agent.Space starts with a different unit of work: a software project. Its cloud Workspace keeps project files, coding-agent Sessions, Previews, and deliberate handoff context together so work can continue beyond one local terminal or one conversation.
The supported agent harness and the model are separate choices. A harness organizes tools, context, permissions, and the execution loop; a model supplies reasoning and generation. For example, developers can evaluate the current Codex Workspace or Claude Code Workspace, then select a compatible model through the live product.
Agent.Space is the more relevant option when you need to:
- keep a coding project available in the cloud across work sessions;
- let supported agents work against the same saved project tree in separate Sessions;
- inspect changed files, outputs, and supported Previews before continuing;
- hand explicit project state to another Session or teammate;
- use current Agent.Space model capacity in a supported Workspace or through the separate Developer API route.
The guide to how Agent.Space works explains the boundaries in more detail. It does not claim that one agent can see another agent's private reasoning, that every model works with every harness, or that processes run forever. The durable unit is the saved project and the context deliberately preserved around it.
Agent.Space currently uses Share plans for fixed model allowance and Flex for metered usage, alongside its Workspace. Because plan availability and allowance can change, compare the live options on the Agent.Space pricing page instead of relying on a copied price in a comparison article.
Where Agent.Space is not a Gemini Enterprise replacement
Agent.Space can be a choice for a coding-agent Workspace. It should not be presented as a replacement for Gemini Enterprise when the requirement is:
- enterprise-wide search across company systems;
- a catalog of managed business-data connectors;
- organization-level agent discovery for every department;
- centralized compliance, audit, encryption, or data-residency controls at Gemini Enterprise scope;
- no-code business automation for a broad non-technical workforce.
The reverse boundary also matters. A broad enterprise AI platform and a coding-specific Workspace may both help technical teams, but that does not make their project workflows identical. Before choosing, define the actual object that must persist: company knowledge and governed access, or a coding project with files, agent Sessions, and reviewable output.
A simple decision process
- Name the primary user. Is this an organization-wide employee platform managed by IT, or a development workflow used by technical contributors?
- Name the source of truth. Is the work grounded in enterprise systems and indexed knowledge, or in a software project's current files?
- List required controls. Separate enterprise identity, connector, audit, compliance, and governance requirements from project-level membership and execution controls.
- Define the agent task. Decide whether users are searching, summarizing, and automating across business systems or changing and verifying a repository.
- Compare the complete cost. Use current seats, quotas, usage, model capacity, runtime, storage, and operational support—not a single headline price.
- Run a bounded trial. Test one representative workflow and verify the source data, permissions, output, persistence, and review path.
This process prevents a similar product name from deciding the architecture.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agent.Space owned by Google?
No. Agent.Space is an independent product and is not owned by, affiliated with, or presented as an official product of Google.
Is Google Agentspace discontinued?
The old Agentspace name is no longer the current product destination. Google states that Agentspace is now part of Gemini Enterprise and that its agent creation and orchestration technology powers core Gemini Enterprise functions. Evaluate the current Gemini Enterprise product and documentation.
Is Agent.Space an alternative to Google Agentspace?
Only for a narrow coding-agent Workspace decision. It is not an alternative to Gemini Enterprise's enterprise search, connector, organization-wide governance, or broad employee-agent platform.
Can Gemini Enterprise be used by developers?
Yes, Gemini Enterprise includes capabilities relevant to developers and IT teams. But if the specific task is to keep Codex, Claude Code, or another supported coding-agent harness working against a persistent project tree, compare that workflow directly with Agent.Space rather than assuming the broader product category answers it.
Choose by the work, not the name
Google Agentspace led into Gemini Enterprise: a broad Google Cloud platform for enterprise knowledge, connected applications, agents, and governance. Agent.Space is an independent product for supported coding agents and persistent software projects. They may appear beside each other in search, but they are not the same company, product, or implementation path.
If your requirement is enterprise search and governed business agents, continue with Gemini Enterprise. If it is a reviewable cloud coding project that can continue across supported Agent Sessions, start with the Agent.Space Workspace and test one bounded task.